<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 100mm 2.8 L IS Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tylermerrick.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/canon-100mm-2-8-l-is-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tylermerrick.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/canon-100mm-2-8-l-is-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canon-100mm-2-8-l-is-review</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nintendo dsi r4</title>
		<link>http://tylermerrick.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/13/canon-100mm-2-8-l-is-review/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>nintendo dsi r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tylermerrick.com/blog/?p=501#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I bought this lense recently on Amazon and immediately in love with it. The build quality &amp; its &quot;look&amp;feel&quot; is good enough for a L-series lense. According to Canon, this is the first L lense that made of &quot;engineer plastics&quot; instead of traditional aluminum metal. But I see no difference in the build quality. In fact, this is even better in term of weight (this one is one of low weight L-series lense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this lense recently on Amazon and immediately in love with it. The build quality &amp; its &#8220;look&amp;feel&#8221; is good enough for a L-series lense. According to Canon, this is the first L lense that made of &#8220;engineer plastics&#8221; instead of traditional aluminum metal. But I see no difference in the build quality. In fact, this is even better in term of weight (this one is one of low weight L-series lense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

